Skip to main content

Full text of "Two Napoleonic relics : a paper read before the February meeting of the York Pioneer and Historical Society"

See other formats


The  EDITH  and  LORNE  PIERCE 
COLLECTION  of  CANADI  ANA 


§lueenys  University  at  Kingston 


QUEEN'S 

UNIVERSITY 

LIBRARY 


KINGSTON,    ONTARIO 
CANADA 


The  EDITH  and  LORNE  PIERCE 
COLLECTION  o^  CAN  Am  am  a 


Queen' 


A    PAPER 

Read  befort  the   February  meeting  of 
the   York    Pioneer   and  His- 
torical  Society 


REV.    HENRY    5CADDING,   D.  D. 


TORONTO: 

The  Evening  Telegka.m. 


TWO    NAPOLEONIC    RELICS. 


We  must  all  of  us  have  remarked  that 
in  the  dates  which  we  have  been  famil- 
iarly using  for  several  years  past  are 
the  exact  counterparts,  if  we  substitute 
eight  for  seven,  of  dates  with  which  we 
are  very  familiar  as  having  been  those 
of  events  of  a  striking  character,  oc- 
curring just  at  the  close  of  the  last 
century.  It  seems  a  very  little  while 
ago  since  we  were  using  the  dates  1889- 
92-94,  and  we  could  not  help  being  re 
minded  thereby  of  similar  dates,  1789, 
storming  of  the  Bastile,  1793-94,  the 
Reign  of  Terror,  and  other  dates  mark- 
ing dreadful  events  in  the  drama  not  yet 
entirely  played  out,  known  as  the  French 
Revolution. 

We  also  here  in  Western  Canada  have 
bad  several  centennial  celebrations  late- 
ly, that  of  the  organization  of  the  Pro- 
vince of  Upper  Canada,  for  example,  and 
holding  of  its  first  Parliament  in  1792, 
the  laying  out  of  York,  i.e.,  Toronto,  in 
1793,  and  so  forth,  and  in  this  year, 
1895,  we  recall  the  close  of  the  ever- 
memorable  administration  of  Governor 
Simcoe  in  1795. 

Kow  unaware  were  our  forefathers  of 
the  startling  events  which  were  occur- 
ring in  Europe  at  the  very  moment  when 
they  were  acting  and  moving  and  mak- 
ing their  mark  on  the  soil  of  Canada 
here  ;  and  it  is  often  well  for  us  for  our 
comfort  and  peace  of  mind,  that  we  are 
not  made  acquainted  with  things  that 
are  happening  at  particular  momenta 
just  outside  our  own  sphere. 


By  a  curious  engraving  which  I  hap- 
pen to  possess,  I  am  reminded  that  about 
this  time  100  years  ago  Napoleou  Bona- 
parte was  beginning  to  be  the  terror  of 
Western    Europe. 

In  three-years*  time  from  1795  he  was 
seriously  threatening  England  with  in- 
vasion at  the  head  of  an  overwhelming 
force.  It  was  simply  at  the  moment, 
perhaps,  only  a  pretence  just  to  spread 
alarm  and  to  cover  ulterior  designs.  He 
collected  at  St.  Malo,  on  the  coast  of 
Brittany,  iu  France,  an  immense  force, 
naval  and  military,  ostensibly  for 
the  invasion  of  England  ;  but  in  reality 
it  was  probably  from  the  very  outset 
intended  simply  to  mask  the  attack 
upon  Egypt,  which  he  suddenly  made  in 
the  year  1798,  and  which  was  so  gal- 
lantly checkmated  by  Nelson  at  the  Bat- 
tle  of  the   Nile. 

It  is  in  connection  with  the  gathering 
of  an  armament  for  the  alleged  invasion 
of  England  that  the  old  engraving  in 
my  possession  has  an  interest.  I  have 
accordingly  determined  to  exhibit  it  to 
you.  It  was  found  among  the  papers  of 
my  father,  who,  I  know,  set  a  particu- 
lar value  upon  it  as  having  been  secured 
by  him  at  the  time  of  the  great  alarm 
felt  in  England  at  the  prospect  of  an  in- 
vasion by  Napoleon  Bonaparte.  More- 
over, it  may  not  be  inappropriate  to 
do  so  in  that  the  name  and  fame  of 
Napoleon  are  at  the  present  time  under- 
going a  revival  in  consequence  of  the 
simultaneous  publication  of  illustrated 
memoirs  of  Napoleon  in  several  popular 
periodicals. 

The  print  to  which  I  refer  professes 
to   give    a  view   of    a    huge   raft   as   seen 


afloat  at  St.  Malo  in  February,  1798, 
and  was  "  published  February  13,  1798, 
by  John  Fairburn,  No.  146  Minories, 
London."  This  engraving  represents  the 
apparatus  for  conveying  the  expeditioD 
to  the  shores  of  England,  consisting  of 
a  kind  of  gigantic  ferry  raft,  bearing  in 
the  midst  apparently  a  bomb-proof, 
metal-sheathed  citadel  and  surmounted 
by  a  tall  mast,  bearing  a  flag  some- 
what resembling  the  tri-color  of  later 
years. 

The  whole  raft  is  supposed  to  be  pro- 
pelled forward  by  means  of  tour  engines 
contained  in  the  same  number  of  low 
towers,  situated  two  at  each  end  :  each 
engine  •  turns  a  paddle-wheel  of  large 
diameter,  set  in  motion  by  a  con- 
trivance of  six  horizontal  sweeps  placed 
on  the  top  of  the  towers,  so  as  to  be 
acted  upon  by  the  wind  after  the  man- 
ner of  the  great  sweeps  of  a  windmill, 
only  moving  not  vertically,  but  as  we 
have  said  horizontally. 

We  have  here  paddle-wheel  propulsion 
of  yov\  large  vessels,  anticipated  with 
wind  instead  of  steam  as  the  moving 
agent. 

On  the  flat  floor  of  the  rait  are  seen 
squadrons  of  cavalry  proceeding  at  full 
gallop,  in  perfect  order,  however,  pass- 
ing across  the  surface,  having  entered 
the  ^rea.t  floating  affair  by  a  set  of 
dra w-bridges  at  one  end,  which  can  evi- 
dently be  lifted  up  when  the  process  of 
embarkation  is  completed,  whilst  a  cor- 
responding set  of  drawbridges  to  be  used 
for  debarkation  are  seen  at  the  other 
eud   already    hauled    up. 

They  are  deploying  round  and  passing 
into  an  arched  entrance  to  quarters  pro- 


5 

vided  for  them  in  the  basement  of  the 
central  fortress  or   citadel. 

The  engraving  before  us  informs  us 
that  this  extraordinary  structure  was 
600  feet  long  by  300  broad,  mounts  500 
pieces  of  cannon,  36  and  48-pounders, 
and  is  to  convey  15,000  troops,  etc.,  for 
the  invasion  of  England. 

In  the  background  is  seen  the  Town 
of  St.  Malo,  partially  lining  the  shore, 
with  adjoining  heights,  each  crowned 
with  a  signal  tower  and  flagstaff.  Park- 
man,  in  his  •■  Pioneers  of  France  in  the 
New  World,"  page  181,  thus  describes 
the   town  of   St.   Malo  :— 

"  The  ancient  town  of  St.  Malo,  thrust 
out  like  a  buttress  into  the  sea,  strange 
and  grim  of  aspect,  breathing  war  from 
its  walls  and  battlements  of  rugged  stone 
—a  stronghold  of  privateers,  the  home 
of  a  race  whose  intractable  and  defiant 
independence  neither  time  nor  change 
has  subdued—  has  been  for  centuries  a 
nursery  for  hardy  mariners." 

Parkmau  then  refers  to  Jacques  Car- 
tier,  in  whom  Canadians  are  so  much 
interested,  inasmuch  as  it  was  from  this 
port  that  he  sailed  on  his  famous  voy- 
age of  discovery  in  the  New  World, 
April    20,   1534. 

Parkman  describes  the  portrait  of 
Jacques  Cartier  preserved  at  St.  Malo, 
now  become  familiar  to  all  Canadians 
from   Hamel's  copy  thereof. 

Parkman  informs  us  that  it  shows  him 
as  a  man  of  bold,  keen  features,  bespeak- 
ing a  spirit  not  apt  to  quail  before  the 
wrath  of  man  or  of  the  elements. 

In  the  account  appended  to  the  engrav- 
ing of  the  St.  Malo  raft,  it  should  be 
subjoined,    we    are    told,    that      a   bomb- 


proof  arrangement  was  made  for  the 
working  of  the  paddle-wheels  by  horse- 
power, whenever  the  wind  apparatus 
should  be  unavailable. 

It  may  be  added,  too,  that  another 
great  raft,  the  exact  counterpart  of  the 
one  described,  is  seen  in  the  distance, 
putting       out       to       sea,       whilst  a 

fleet        lies        in        readiness       in  the 

harbor  under  the  heights  close  by. 
Whether  these  formidable  appliances  for 
the  invasion  of  England  were  ever  con- 
structed in  all  their  completeness  or  not 
may  be  a  question,  but  it  is  not  im- 
probable that  we  have  in  these  pictures 
of  them  reproductions  of  adumbrasions 
made  in  outline  by  the  hand  of  the  clever 
Engineer   Napoleon    himself. 

After  the  abortive  preparations  of  1798 
Napoleou  still  did  not  relinquish  the  de- 
signs which  he  had  formed  for  the  in- 
vasion of  England.  In  the  year  1804 
he  assembled  an  armament  with  the 
same  object  in  view  on  a  vast  scale,  but 
on  this  occasion  not  at  St.  Malo,  but 
at  the  port  of  Boulogne,  nineteen  miles 
south-west  of  Calais. 

In  the  meantime  he  had  caused  himself 
to  be  elected   Emperor  of  the  French. 

His  armj-,  which  was  styled  the  Army 
of  England,  now  consisted,  it  is  said, 
of  180,000  men.  and  a  flotilla  of  2,400 
transports*.  Napoleon,  fully  confident  of 
the  success  of  this  renewed  attempt  on 
England,  had  the  die  of  a  medal  pre- 
pared, which  was  to  be  struck  on  his 
taking  possession  of  London.  The  en- 
graver was  Jeuffroy,  the  designer  was 
Demon,  the  device  on  the  reverse  was 
Hercules  holding  an  amphibious  monster 
in  the  air,  half  man  and  half  sea-serpent, 


crushing  it  to  death.  The  monster,  of 
course,  represented  England,  and  Her- 
cules   was  France. 

In  the  mind  of  Napoleon  and  his  artists 
the  wish  was  doubtless  father  to  the 
thought,  but.  ass  we  know,  it  was  not 
destined  to  be   fulfilled. 

The    allusion   in    the    device    is   to     tv«> 
mythological   story  of  the  destructic 
Antaeus    by     Hercules.        Antaeus,    as 
story  goes,  was  the  son  of  Neptuj 
Terra,   and  was   powerless  so  long  .. 
was    kept    from      contact      with    Mottle 
Earth,    a   contact    he    was    ever    desirous 
of   repeating. 

I  exhibit  the  engraving  of  the  medal 
thus  described,  which  appears  in  Plate 
V.,  contained  in  Edward  Edwards'  Napo- 
leon Medals,  published  in  London  by  Paul 
and  Dominie  Colnaghi  in  1837.  At  page 
15  of  that  work  we  are  informed  that 
"  the  dies  of  this  medal  were  engraved 
in  Paris,  at  the  epoch  when  the  expe- 
dition against  England  was  preparing, 
and  were  intended  to  have  been  employed 
in  London  after  the  taking  of  that 
city." 

As  the  expedition  did  not  take  place, 
the  medal  was  never  struck.  Some  im- 
pressions, however,  in  soft  metal  and 
fine  plaster  of  Paris  were  made,  and 
from  them  at  a  later  period  Eac  similes 
were  derived,  copies  of  which  are  occa- 
sionally found  in  the  cabinets  of  the 
curious. 

The  medal  bears  the  inscription  in 
French,  "  Descente  en  Angleterre,"  i.e.. 
"  Attack  on  England,"  and  below 
are  the  words  "  Frappee  a  Londres, 
1804,"  i.e.,  "  Struck  at  London  in  the 
year  1804."    But  London    was  not  captur- 


8 

ed.  The  trained  bands  of  London  stood  in 
the  way,  and  more  formidable  still  were 
the  people  of  the  three  Kingdoms,  linked 
together  as  one  united  phalanx  for  de- 
fence. 

It  is  somewhat  singular  that  a  lofty 
and  conspicuous  column  164  feet  in 
height  should  be  seen  to  this  day  on  the 
heights  above  Boulogne,  recalling  the 
memory  of  Napoleon's  quixotic  ideas  in 
regard  to  the  annexation  of  England  to  - 
the  Empire  of  France. 

How  noble  is  the  future  which  offers 
itself  to  the  British  Empire  throughout 
the  globe,  could  it*  sons  everywhere  be 
induced  to  dwell  together  in  unity,  and 
on  every  critical  occasion  to  act  like 
their  forefathers  when  a  tyrant  sought 
to  lay  a  yoke  upon  their  necks.  In  this 
way,  what  Shakespeare  said  of  the  lim- 
ited England  of  his  time  will  be  ful- 
filled in  the  case  of  the  greater  Eng- 
land of  to-day,  and  still  more  in  the 
case  of  the  vaster  and  more  compact 
British  Empire  of  the  following  ages. 

I  close  with  a  portion  of  his  words 
to  be  found  at  the  end  of  the  famous 
tragedy  of  "  King  John,"  making  there- 
in the  verbal  change  of  "  the  Empire  " 
for  England  : 

*'  This  Empire  never  did,  nor  never  shall, 
Lie  at  the  proud  foot  of  a    conqueror. 

Come  the  three   corners  of  the   world  in 

arms, 
And  we   shall  shock   them.    Nought  shall 

make  us   rue, 
Let  but  the  Empire  to  itself   rest  true." 


'